I like it alot. I had an ex with toes that pointed out. She was gorgeous.
I like the form of this model alot. Especially around the middle. She doesn’t look ‘emaciated’ like many of the female models that have been posted in the past (not just here). I guess anorexia is considered anatomically correct for some reason.
Sorry if I didn’t have an advanced critique for you, I just think it looks great. Besides, I don’t really know what you don’t like about it so can’t really say what needs changed. Fair enough? IMHO CG anatomical realism, as it’s often defined or (critiqued for that matter) by some users, isn’t all that accurate… and like mine, is normally just a speculative opinion, only partly based on real anatomy study. If you’ll notice, the first reference’s arms are a bit short. The hands are typically a little closer to the kneecap. (not too close! that would look dorky!) Stand up, and try. You’ll see what I mean.The ones in the ana-ref could be off by at least 3-4 inches. They seem to be closer to the hip/buttox area than the midthigh/knee area.
Anyway, enough babble. She’s going to look nice textured. Keep workin’ on 'er!
~ wonders how many different types of real live female bodies many anatomy critiquers here have actually seen, and/or would they critique that significant other in much the same way… or do they… just keep it to themselves? ~
hrmm, I wonder if a dragon ever came in here and would say something like “the tail was too long” or “too much fire”, etc,… ok enough sillyness. I guess it’s time for bed now.
On that note…
~ wanders off elsewhere minding his own business ~